Showing posts with label Happiness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Happiness. Show all posts

Thursday, August 14, 2014

Book Review--Selfish Reasons To Have More Kids: Why Being a Great Parent Is Less Work and More Fun Than You Think

I’d like to take a quick break from jihad, genocide, and military operations to discuss something a little happier—babies.  While I normally eschew parenting books, I recently read one by Bryan Caplan, an economist who is often retweeted by my favorite libertarian. Caplan’s premise in Selfish Reasons To Have More Kids is simple: Today’s Typical Parent puts an insane amount of unnecessary effort into raising children.   He amalgamates social science studies to reach the conclusion that this effort rarely pays off.  Twin and adoption research routinely shows that family environment--the "nurture" in "nature versus nurture"--has little effect on a child’s health, happiness, intelligence, success, character, or values.  So the time that parents spend fretting about their children’s homework or resumes will do little to change what college they get into.

Caplan’s advice: ditch the baby Einstein or the endless ballet, karate, and violin classes.  Instead, have a baby with someone that has the traits you prefer.  If you want a smart kid, marry a smart woman.  If you want a kid with a criminal record, go for the “bad boy” type.  My favorite quote: “The right spouse is like a genie who grants wishes you are powerless to achieve through your own efforts.”  So spend the time that you would have spent at one of those pointless success-building activities doing something that makes you happy. 

Once people realize that raising children is easier than they thought, then it is in their own self-interest to have more kids.  Caplan urges them to look past the lack of sleep they will get in the first few months or the angst their teens will throw at them.  Instead, they should think of themselves in their sixties.  More kids presumably means more visitors, and might mean more grandkids.


Caplan is so logical.  I especially liked his translation of psychological and sociological studies into concrete parenting advice.  Although I disagreed with some parts of his “Life-Giving Science” chapter—the bioethicist in me believes that there should be some limiting principles in reproductive technology besides those provided by simple market theory—on the whole, he makes a compelling argument.  If people become better at evaluating their own long-term self-interest, they will realize that bringing another child into the world is a pretty darn good deal.  I recommend this book to anyone who is currently parenting or would like to have kids in the future.  You can borrow my copy—but only after my husband reads it.  I have a feeling he’s going to push back on the sociological research that bolsters Caplan’s theory. 

Why does this book review belong on a blog about America's issues? Caplan expressly says that he is NOT advocating for government intervention in family planning.  But he also argues that having more kids would be good for the country.  New people mean new ideas. New ideas mean solutions to existing problems. So maybe the best way to fix the situation we are in now is to just find intelligent, driven spouses, have a mess of kids with them, and hope the next generation can sort things out. 

Saturday, August 2, 2014

Will you see an IRS agent at mass tomorrow?

I came across a startling headline this morning: IRS Strikes Deal With Atheists To Monitor Sermons And Homilies.  The article, which referred to Lois “Fifth Amendment” Lerner, was obviously partisan, so I tried to get a fuller picture from the other side: the Freedom From Religion Foundation.  The FFRF declared victory in the voluntary dismissal of its federal suit against the IRS.  Basically, the FFRF complained that the IRS refused to enforce § 501(c)(3)’s electioneering restrictions against churches and religious institutions.  Under the restrictions, if an organization attempts to influence legislation or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office, it loses its tax-exempt status.  After the IRS showed that it investigates the political actions of churches and will continue to do so, the FFRF agreed to dismiss the suit.

So is the first headline simply hyperbolic fear-mongering?  Yes and no.  The FFRF’s suit emphasized the “Pulpit Freedom Sunday” practices of certain churches.  The Alliance Defending Freedom described Pulpit Freedom Sunday as a “strategic litigation plan”—pastors would preach about the intersection of the political realm and scriptural Truth on a certain day, and presumably IRS would revoke their churches’ tax-exempt status, thus triggering a First Amendment lawsuit.  So the agreement reached by the FFRF and IRS means that the IRS will likely monitor the sermons on Pulpit Freedom Sunday, which is the goal of Pulpit Freedom Sunday in the first place.  The more troubling implication for me is that the IRS will monitor sermons that aren't part of a strategic litigation plan.  And the possibility of IRS monitoring will have a chilling effect on preaching, which is at the heart of religious exercise.  So if you care about the First Amendment, keep an eye on this story.

My husband brought up an interesting point: the IRS is using our tax dollars to monitor sermons.  Even people who are not as keen on the First Amendment right to free exercise of religion as I am have to admit that paying government employees overtime to listen to pastors on Sundays might not be the best use of funds.


I’ll end this post with a hearty congratulations to Meg Sweeney, who is more passionate about the First Amendment than anyone else I know.  Yesterday, she got engaged to Brett Bean, another illustrious Notre Dame lawyer.  We at So Proudly We Hailed are thrilled for you both!